The sense of simply вЂa bunch of talking headsвЂ™ is less obvious here. The artwork is just as strong, but with more focus on animating things in the background, making the action sequences flawlessly smooth, with lots of movement. LetвЂ™s just be glad BONES only improves on its trade, and Brotherhood was the 2003 version with a visual make over. BrotherhoodД®ven 6 years later, anime can sometimes have hideous visuals. It varied a lot вЂ“ from mediocre to excellent. The action scenes rarely have speed lines and short cuts, but they appeared once or twice. There is a lot of вЂtalking headsвЂ™, with little happening in terms of body language or in the background.

Its downfall would have to be the number of stills. Backgrounds were nicely drawn, and action scenes were smooth. The artwork was the strongest part, and choice of colors. LetвЂ™s look at each show section by section, shall we? ANIMATION 2003 VersionДЇor itвЂ™s time, the 2003 version had quite good animation. The subject matter is incredibly interesting and this universe has been extremely well thought out вЂ“ almost to Harry Potter standards. The franchise combines science fiction, action, drama, comedy, mystery and a hint of mushiness here and there вЂ“ it is almost guaranteed to entertain, no matter who you are. BONES.ДЇirst thing is first: this is a great show for anime newbies.

I will try not say which one is вЂњbetterвЂќ, but point out the key differences and leave the decision up to you. If you are new to the anime scene, you may be wondering: вЂњWhatвЂ™s all the fuss about? Is it really that good? Which version should I watch?вЂќ This is what I hope to decipher for you. Fullmetal Alchemist: Differences between the 2003 Version & BrotherhoodДЇullmetal Alchemist is an iconic anime that has been recommended countless times over the past decade.

Fullmetal alchemist watch order